Hurricane Electric's IPv6 Tunnel Broker Forums

Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to Hurricane Electric's Tunnelbroker.net forums!

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
 71 
 on: February 25, 2021, 04:03:48 PM 
Started by ptirc - Last post by broquea
You should really be using your statically routed /64, not the link point-to-point range. Try with that. Also, 2001:470:1f12:136::1/64 is the IP on our side of the tunnel interface. Try not using that, ever.

 72 
 on: February 25, 2021, 01:00:13 PM 
Started by ptirc - Last post by ptirc
Any ideas from anyone?

This is kinda annoying because, as far as I know the generated IPS are valid except that not every one of them are usable.

Cheers!

 73 
 on: February 21, 2021, 02:44:24 PM 
Started by ptirc - Last post by ptirc
Hello everyone!

First of all, let me congratulate you for this amazing service!

I'm new to this tunnel things and kinda new on Linux well and I just recently received my tunnel.

After going through the procedure to become a Sage and unlock IRC and SMTP access I decided to test a few things with the tunnel.

I've figured out that I couldn't use some addresses, although the tunnel is properly set with netplan.

I have a bash script that generates a random IP from the /64 subnet, to be assigned to each ZNC (IRC Bouncer) user.

The script is the following:

Code: [Select]
#!/bin/bash
randomize=$(cat /dev/urandom | tr -dc 'a-zA-Z0-9' | fold -w 32 | head -n 1)
printf "2001:470:1f12:136$(echo -n $randomize | sha1sum | head -c 16 | sed 's/..../:&/g')\n"

And it ouputs something like:

2001:470:1f12:136:4fec:c00a:acd0:3fdd
2001:470:1f12:136:af49:1934:ae1b:2289
2001:470:1f12:136:3b17:a031:d793:bd67


Those IPs are correct, as far as I know.

I can successfully make ZNC, eggdrops and such connect to IRC with IPs like:

2001:470:1f12:136::1
2001:470:1f12:136::2
2001:470:1f12:136::3


But when comes to those long IPs, some are usable and some others aren't.

Worth to mention that I can ping the server via those long IPs and even telnet to some bots and other programs via those same IPs, but outgoing/outbound connections doesn't always work.

Any ideas/thoughts?

TIA

 74 
 on: February 20, 2021, 03:37:58 PM 
Started by tmberg - Last post by broquea
AS1299 had a route loop in their network that they corrected.

 75 
 on: February 20, 2021, 03:37:48 PM 
Started by nordmark - Last post by broquea
AS1299 had a route loop in their network that they corrected.

 76 
 on: February 20, 2021, 09:21:53 AM 
Started by AndrewButterworth - Last post by AndrewButterworth
Looks like it got fixed around 15:50 UTC today.
The MRTG graph for my tunnel starts showing traffic around then.
Code: [Select]
Z:\>tracert -d 216.66.84.42

Tracing route to 216.66.84.42 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1     6 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.80.30
  2     1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.120.14
  3     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  4     6 ms    15 ms     6 ms  149.6.9.57
  5     6 ms     6 ms     7 ms  130.117.48.145
  6     8 ms    10 ms     8 ms  154.54.60.13
  7     9 ms     7 ms    10 ms  154.54.57.162
  8     8 ms     8 ms     8 ms  62.115.185.38
  9    15 ms    15 ms    16 ms  62.115.120.74
 10    16 ms    15 ms    15 ms  62.115.113.210
 11    15 ms    15 ms    15 ms  62.115.136.195
 12    14 ms    15 ms    14 ms  213.248.72.146
 13    20 ms    20 ms    23 ms  184.105.81.109
 14    74 ms    20 ms    20 ms  216.66.84.42

Trace complete.

 77 
 on: February 20, 2021, 07:16:28 AM 
Started by matth1187 - Last post by tmberg
Yes many years ago. And mine got a nasty stain on it also. :(

 78 
 on: February 20, 2021, 06:51:41 AM 
Started by nordmark - Last post by tmberg
Delete/remove twelve99.net.  :D ;D

 79 
 on: February 20, 2021, 06:43:49 AM 
Started by nordmark - Last post by tmberg
The delay was superb before the server died.

 80 
 on: February 20, 2021, 06:40:35 AM 
Started by tmberg - Last post by tmberg
Hmm... Routingloop deluxe..

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10