It's possible that my previous DNS had a long TTL, but I've been waiting for around 48 hours with no change in how the test completes. Is this a TTL issue or have I done something wrong?
opus2:~ ew2193$ dig ns milosmeadow.com
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> ns milosmeadow.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 56860
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 8
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;milosmeadow.com. IN NS
;; ANSWER SECTION:
milosmeadow.com. 1800 IN NS ns4.he.net.
milosmeadow.com. 1800 IN NS ns2.he.net.
milosmeadow.com. 1800 IN NS ns3.he.net.
milosmeadow.com. 1800 IN NS ns5.he.net.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns2.he.net. 415 IN A 216.218.131.2
ns2.he.net. 415 IN AAAA 2001:470:200::2
ns3.he.net. 415 IN A 216.218.132.2
ns3.he.net. 415 IN AAAA 2001:470:300::2
ns4.he.net. 415 IN A 216.66.1.2
ns4.he.net. 415 IN AAAA 2001:470:400::2
ns5.he.net. 415 IN A 216.66.80.18
ns5.he.net. 415 IN AAAA 2001:470:500::2
;; Query time: 126 msec
;; SERVER: 169.226.1.103#53(169.226.1.103)
;; WHEN: Thu Mar 28 08:16:55 2013
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 287
opus2:~ ew2193$ dig aaaa ns4.he.net
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> aaaa ns4.he.net
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 54323
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 8
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ns4.he.net. IN AAAA
;; ANSWER SECTION:
ns4.he.net. 7200 IN AAAA 2001:470:400::2
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
he.net. 401 IN NS ns5.he.net.
he.net. 401 IN NS ns4.he.net.
he.net. 401 IN NS ns2.he.net.
he.net. 401 IN NS ns1.he.net.
he.net. 401 IN NS ns3.he.net.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.he.net. 401 IN A 216.218.130.2
ns2.he.net. 401 IN A 216.218.131.2
ns2.he.net. 401 IN AAAA 2001:470:200::2
ns3.he.net. 401 IN A 216.218.132.2
ns3.he.net. 401 IN AAAA 2001:470:300::2
ns4.he.net. 401 IN A 216.66.1.2
ns5.he.net. 401 IN A 216.66.80.18
ns5.he.net. 401 IN AAAA 2001:470:500::2
;; Query time: 66 msec
;; SERVER: 169.226.1.103#53(169.226.1.103)
;; WHEN: Thu Mar 28 08:17:09 2013
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 306
opus2:~ ew2193$ dig aaaa milosmeadow.com @2001:470:400::2
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> aaaa milosmeadow.com @2001:470:400::2
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 3793
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;milosmeadow.com. IN AAAA
;; ANSWER SECTION:
milosmeadow.com. 3600 IN AAAA 2001:470:7:eaa::8080
;; Query time: 26 msec
;; SERVER: 2001:470:400::2#53(2001:470:400::2)
;; WHEN: Thu Mar 28 08:17:37 2013
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 61
I did not notice any problems with your DNS records. But doesn't the test also require you to have a server running at the IPv6 address the DNS records point to?
Quote from: kasperd on March 28, 2013, 06:23:51 AM
I did not notice any problems with your DNS records. But doesn't the test also require you to have a server running at the IPv6 address the DNS records point to?
??? Somehow managed to both put in the wrong prefix AND the address fell off the server.
opus2:~ ew2193$ ping6 2001:470:7:eaa::8080
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2620:89:8000:74:cabc:c8ff:fe9a:3475 --> 2001:470:7:eaa::8080
^C
--- 2001:470:7:eaa::8080 ping6 statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
opus2:~ ew2193$ ping6 2001:470:8:eaa::8080
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2620:89:8000:74:cabc:c8ff:fe9a:3475 --> 2001:470:8:eaa::8080
^C
--- 2001:470:8:eaa::8080 ping6 statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
opus2:~ ew2193$ ping6 2001:470:8:eaa::8080
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2620:89:8000:74:cabc:c8ff:fe9a:3475 --> 2001:470:8:eaa::8080
16 bytes from 2001:470:8:eaa::8080, icmp_seq=0 hlim=54 time=49.864 ms
16 bytes from 2001:470:8:eaa::8080, icmp_seq=1 hlim=54 time=51.329 ms
^C
--- 2001:470:8:eaa::8080 ping6 statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 49.864/50.596/51.329/0.732 ms
So I'll give it another hour for those TTL's to time out and give it another try, thanks for another set of eyes!
Thanks, don't know what exactly, but updated the records, waited and I'm golden with Guru and Sage levels!!!