• Welcome to Hurricane Electric's IPv6 Tunnel Broker Forums.

All works except www.ietf.org

Started by lan787, July 01, 2011, 04:17:59 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

lan787

Have a router with debian squeeze and desktops in /48 routed subnet (currently i use one /64 with 2001:470:dc05:0000 prefix). I can reach any ipv6 site on the Internet except www.ietf.org from routed subnet. It works though if I try to reach it from my router directly.

from router [OK]

traceroute to www.ietf.org (2001:1890:1112:1::1e), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
1  2001:470:27:92c::1  81.123 ms
2  2001:470:0:11e::1  80.873 ms
3  2001:470:0:110::1  105.347 ms
4  2001:470:0:1d2::1  126.161 ms
5  2001:470:0:3e::1  184.776 ms
6  2001:470:0:1dd::2  185.141 ms
7  ::ffff:12.122.81.110  196.694 ms
8  ::ffff:12.122.3.38  196.566 ms
9  ::ffff:12.123.10.250  196.500 ms
10  *
11  2001:1890:1112:1::1e  283.030 ms


from routed subnet [fail]

traceroute to www.ietf.org (2001:1890:1112:1::1e) from 2001:470:dc05:0:222:15ff:fec5:f34a, 30 hops max, 16 byte packets
1  2001:470:dc05::1  3.706 ms
2  2001:470:27:92c::1  81.379 ms
3  2001:470:0:11e::1  78.641 ms
4  2001:470:0:110::1  104.555 ms
5  2001:470:0:1d2::1  119.665 ms
6  2001:470:0:3e::1  182.723 ms
7  2001:470:0:1dd::2  183.04 ms
8  ::ffff:12.122.81.110  192.917 ms
9  ::ffff:12.122.3.38  192.847 ms
10  ::ffff:12.123.10.250  192.538 ms
11  *
12  *
13  *
14  *


Is that an external routing problem?
But if i make ping packets on my router to originate from routed subnet (not from tunnel endpoint) I will still receive the reply
PING 2001:1890:1112:1::1e(2001:1890:1112:1::1e) from 2001:470:dc05::1 : 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2001:1890:1112:1::1e: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=702 ms

pings from desktops remain unreplied. tcpdump on tunnel interface shows pings going out, but never returning back. Netfilter logs didn't show any filtered packets.
So I'm kind of at loss here. What could be the problem?

Here is routing table of my router
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination                    Next Hop                   Flag Met Ref Use If
2001:470:27:92c::1/128         ::                         U    1024 0     1 he-ipv6
2001:470:27:92c::/64           ::                         Un   256 0     0 he-ipv6
2001:470:dc05::/64             ::                         U    256 0     0 eth1
fe80::/64                      ::                         U    256 0     0 eth0
fe80::/64                      ::                         U    256 0     0 eth1
fe80::/64                      ::                         Un   256 0     0 he-ipv6
::/0                           2001:470:27:92c::1         UG   1024 0  4306 he-ipv6
::/0                           ::                         !n   -1  1 66785 lo
::1/128                        ::                         Un   0   1   362 lo
2001:470:27:92c::/128          ::                         Un   0   1     0 lo
2001:470:27:92c::2/128         ::                         Un   0   1 10379 lo
2001:470:dc05::/128            ::                         Un   0   1     5 lo
2001:470:dc05::1/128           ::                         Un   0   1  5453 lo
fe80::/128                     ::                         Un   0   1     0 lo
fe80::/128                     ::                         Un   0   1     0 lo
fe80::c3d0:dbe3/128            ::                         Un   0   1     0 lo
fe80::250:baff:fe47:5c11/128   ::                         Un   0   1     0 lo
fe80::280:48ff:fe2c:8da6/128   ::                         Un   0   1  1586 lo
ff00::/8                       ::                         U    256 0     0 eth0
ff00::/8                       ::                         U    256 0     0 eth1
ff00::/8                       ::                         U    256 0     0 he-ipv6
::/0                           ::                         !n   -1  1 66785 lo


and desktop
Destination                    Next Hop                   Flag Met Ref Use If
2001:470:dc05::/64             ::                         UAe  256 0   185 eth0
fe80::/64                      ::                         U    256 0     0 eth0
::/0                           fe80::280:48ff:fe2c:8da6   UGDAe 1024 0  1029 eth0
::/0                           ::                         !n   -1  1  3468 lo
::1/128                        ::                         Un   0   7   222 lo
2001:470:dc05::2/128           ::                         Un   0   1    17 lo
2001:470:dc05:0:222:15ff:fec5:f34a/128 ::                         Un   0   1 24002 lo
fe80::222:15ff:fec5:f34a/128   ::                         Un   0   1    73 lo
ff00::/8                       ::                         U    256 0     0 eth0
::/0                           ::                         !n   -1  1  3468 lo

cholzhauer

It's not just you



traceroute6 to www.ietf.org (2001:1890:1112:1::1e) from 2001:470:c27d:e000:20c:29ff:fe8a:1618, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets
1  *
    2001:470:c27d:d000:2e0:81ff:fe79:f4c4  2.105 ms  0.554 ms
2  servicespring-1.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net  25.616 ms  23.588 ms  24.297 ms
3  gige-g3-4.core1.chi1.he.net  20.810 ms  20.440 ms  20.642 ms
4  * * *
5  * * *
6  * * *
7  * * *
^C

johnpoz

^ I think you killed it a bit early is all, its working here

Tracing route to www.ietf.org [2001:1890:1112:1::1e]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  3    79 ms    36 ms    38 ms  gige-g3-4.core1.chi1.he.net [2001:470:0:6e::1]
  4     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  5     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  6     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  7     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  8     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  9   152 ms   151 ms   151 ms  mail.ietf.org [2001:1890:1112:1::1e]

Pinging www.ietf.org [2001:1890:1112:1::1e] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 2001:1890:1112:1::1e: time=179ms
Reply from 2001:1890:1112:1::1e: time=153ms




chsharp

Also having been having problems reaching www.ietf.org and rfc-editor.org via IPv6.
www.ietf.org sometimes works.  Haven't gotten http://www.rfc-editor.org to work.
This might be an AT&T (or IETF) routing issue.  Note that www.rfc-editor.org and www.ietf.org are on the same /64.

traceroute6 to www.ietf.org (2001:1890:1112:1::1e):
...
3  gige-g4-12.core1.ash1.he.net  38.342 ms  41.135 ms  38.628 ms
4  10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.nyc4.he.net  60.567 ms  43.998 ms  44.519 ms
5  as7018-att.10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.nyc4.he.net  46.220 ms  46.575 ms  45.124 ms
6  * * *
7  * * *
8  * * *
9  * * *
10  * * *
11  mail.ietf.org  142.117 ms  143.573 ms  141.785 ms

-------------
http://www.rfc-editor.org still doesn't work, but I think that is an AT&T issue.
traceroute6 to www.rfc-editor.org (2001:1890:1112:1::2f) :
...
3  gige-g4-12.core1.ash1.he.net  39.436 ms  46.064 ms  49.402 ms
4  10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.nyc4.he.net  43.630 ms  52.138 ms  58.112 ms
5  as7018-att.10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.nyc4.he.net  46.551 ms  45.812 ms  44.180 ms
6  * * *
7  * * *
8  * * *
9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  2001:1890:1fff:fffd::1  68.000 ms  65.427 ms *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
^C




rwg

Ugh, AT&T joins Cogent on the list of networks that think using IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses on their routers' interfaces is somehow a good idea.

broquea

#5
A HE.NET network engineer contacted AT&T about this on the 27th, and I personally don't know if he heard back directly. I've contacted AT&T about this with your provided information and mine, and hopefully AT&T will get this resolved shortly.

broquea

Please retest, as the IETF also was contacting AT&T to get this resolved and we are once again seeing end to end connectivity over IPv6.

lan787

It works! Thank you HE.
Now I can enjoy reading RFC's over ipv6 :)
$ traceroute6 -n -q 1 www.ietf.org
traceroute to www.ietf.org (2001:1890:1112:1::1e) from 2001:470:dc05:0:222:15ff:fec5:f34a, 30 hops max, 16 byte packets
1  2001:470:dc05::1  1.798 ms
2  2001:470:27:92c::1  80.774 ms
3  2001:470:0:11e::1  78.329 ms
4  2001:470:0:110::1  102.875 ms
5  2001:470:0:1d2::1  123.492 ms
6  2001:470:0:3e::1  190.459 ms
7  2001:470:0:1dd::2  182.711 ms
8  ::ffff:12.122.81.110  192.34 ms
9  ::ffff:12.122.3.38  192.099 ms
10  ::ffff:12.123.10.250  192.462 ms
11  *
12  *
13  2001:1890:1112:1::1e  280.195 ms