Print

[linuxcafe]

Hello! and thanks for the great services!

https://tunnelbroker.net/usage/tunnels_by_latency.php

are these times upgraded every day?

[root@test10 ~]# ping6 -n tserv1.mia1.he.net
PING tserv1.mia1.he.net(2001:470:0:8c::2) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2001:470:0:8c::2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.40 ms
64 bytes from 2001:470:0:8c::2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.49 ms
64 bytes from 2001:470:0:8c::2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.43 ms
64 bytes from 2001:470:0:8c::2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.47 ms

Why i cannot see myself in the stats? ofcourse icmp and icmp6 are not filtered. regards and thanks again!

[simplepanda]

I'm listed twice (for two tunnels) in the top users for Ashburn; latencies are 5ms in both listings. Yet:

5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4006ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.311/1.447/1.667/0.137 ms

So my measured latency is around 1.5ms but he.net's scoreboard shows me at 5ms.

Not sure why the discrepancy but it seems your measured latency is not what HE.net is using.

[linuxcafe]

he-ipv6: ipv6/ip  remote 209.51.161.58  local 208.69.31.149  ttl 255


[root@test10 ~]# ping 209.51.161.58
PING 209.51.161.58 (209.51.161.58) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 209.51.161.58: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=1.39 ms
64 bytes from 209.51.161.58: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=1.47 ms
64 bytes from 209.51.161.58: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=1.43 ms

--- 209.51.161.58 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.397/1.438/1.479/0.045 ms


[root@test10 ~]# traceroute6 tserv1.mia1.he.net
traceroute to tserv1.mia1.he.net (2001:470:0:8c::2), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  tserv1.mia1.he.net (2001:470:0:8c::2)  1.469 ms  1.388 ms  1.380 ms


there i am, still can't understand 

## UPDATE 05/12/2014
#8      linuxcafe (Tunnel #271653)   4.613 ms

after some days, i can see my tunnel in usage statistics! great