Hurricane Electric's IPv6 Tunnel Broker Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to Hurricane Electric's Tunnelbroker.net forums!

Author Topic: RFC3627 vs RFC6164  (Read 324 times)

lbarros

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
RFC3627 vs RFC6164
« on: July 07, 2016, 05:16:40 AM »

I noticed my Client IPv6 address for my tunnel is a /64 based on the RFC3627 but then in 2011 a new RFC6164 came out advising to use /127 for router to router point to point links due to security issues and possible DDoS Neighbor Cache Exhaustion Issues, so I am wondering about this.

I normally use /127 on all my router point to point links at work based on RFC6164 and I was wondering what your take was on this.

Thanks,

Luciano
Logged