Recent posts

#11

Questions & Answers / Error 404

Last post by ltnhawk - January 04, 2023, 07:24:02 AM

Trying to update my tunnel. System returs error 404. Credentials are valid. Please see attached image. Any help greatly appreciated.

#12

Questions & Answers / SMTP was working and shows ope...

Last post by devinderaujla - December 30, 2022, 09:02:12 AM

My SMTP was unblocked and I have been using it for a while but recently discovered that it stopped working. My port 25 is not reachable. HE support can you please check.
account login: devinderaujla

#13

IPv6 Basics & Questions & General Chatter / Re: Are there any public NAT64...

Last post by gator6 - December 29, 2022, 06:38:19 PM

Hi Kasper, is your DoT still active?

Yes it is still active. Is there any particular reason you are asking?

Will talk to you on Matrix. Cheers

#14

IPv6 Basics & Questions & General Chatter / Re: Are there any public NAT64...

Last post by kasperd - December 27, 2022, 06:22:33 PM

Hi Kasper, is your DoT still active?

Yes it is still active. Is there any particular reason you are asking?

#15

IPv6 Basics & Questions & General Chatter / Re: Are there any public NAT64...

Last post by snarked - December 19, 2022, 11:47:28 AM

Response #8 is no longer true.  BIND now supports DoH and DoT natively. Whether such additions have propagated to software packagers is a different issue, but that does not prevent one from compiling BIND from its source.

#16

IPv6 Basics & Questions & General Chatter / Re: Are there any public NAT64...

Last post by gator6 - December 19, 2022, 09:52:42 AM

I have added DoT support to my NAT64 service. The DoT servers have the name dot.nat64.dk.

Hi Kasper, is your DoT still active?

#17

Questions & Answers / Re: Will HE continue their fre...

Last post by sdgathman - December 16, 2022, 11:31:01 AM

Here is a link for the next time you pester your ISP about IPv6 support: https://www.commerce.gov/about/policies/ipv6-policy

#18

Suggest a Test! / Re: IPv6 Prefix Delegation

Last post by sdgathman - December 16, 2022, 11:28:11 AM

Both tests are important.  The DHCP client side is a lower level test, but is less trivial than you think, e.g. NetworkManager has very inflexible support.  You can certainly verify that an address within a delegated prefix can be pinged by he.net - that is also important.  The lower level test is important ammunition for users pestering their ISP to support IPv6 already as you have requested.

I can't think of a way for you to verify that a client has correctly implemented the server side of PD.  But if I do, I'll post it here.

#19

Suggest a Test! / Re: IPv6 Prefix Delegation

Last post by broquea - December 16, 2022, 12:23:04 AM

What's the better test: us logging that your side correctly configured to be a DHCP client and got a range, or that you have the know-how to SET UP a DHCP server and provide PD? I don't think verifying someone configured their host to use DHCP is a decent test of networking/hosting skills.

#20

Questions & Answers / Re: Packet loss e0-30.core2.lo...

Last post by bmhughes - December 14, 2022, 02:37:59 PM

I've tested with another tunnel to the server at 216.66.80.26 (listed at tserv1 but shows at tserv5?) and the problems go away so it looks like an issue with that tunnel server. Annoying to change though as you can't move prefixes between servers.