Hurricane Electric's IPv6 Tunnel Broker Forums

Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to Hurricane Electric's Tunnelbroker.net forums!

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: December 03, 2021, 07:32:16 AM 
Started by SinnerLike - Last post by snarked
Set HE servers as secondary.  Primary is hosted elsewhere, and also allows transfers to your other secondaries.

 2 
 on: December 02, 2021, 10:51:02 PM 
Started by SinnerLike - Last post by SinnerLike
Good day!
I am using dns.he.net for my domain.
I really like your service. Convenient API to update DDNS.

But our Russian Roskomnadzor, in an attempt to censor the Internet and block various VPNs, often "breaks the Internet". Often and for a long time "good" services and sites become unavailable.

I would like to use your service to also use slave DNS somewhere in Russia. But none of the he.net servers are giving away the full zone. How can I customize this?

 3 
 on: December 01, 2021, 07:16:01 AM 
Started by balomiri - Last post by tomkep
This actually might be expected, depending on what firewall management software DD-WRT uses... I stick with plain iptables/nftables, any layer above that makes firewall rules incomprehensible. But if you use it you should invest some time in understanding exactly how it works.

 4 
 on: December 01, 2021, 05:03:37 AM 
Started by balomiri - Last post by balomiri
Solved!

the analysis suggested by you TomKep brought me to the ideea that there is an IPv6 Firewall (not really visible on WEBGUI of dd-wrt) which caused the drop of WAN->LAN access.

So I flushed, for testing, all ip6tables and now the LAN is "naked" in Intenet.

proof:
Code: [Select]
nmap -6 -Pn vicsfritze.balomiri.net -p 41457
Starting Nmap 7.92 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2021-12-01 13:59 CET
Nmap scan report for vicsfritze.balomiri.net (2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742)
Host is up (0.052s latency).
Other addresses for vicsfritze.balomiri.net (not scanned): 192.168.237.3

PORT      STATE SERVICE
41457/tcp open  unknown

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.36 seconds


Thanks again for your impulses TomKep

 5 
 on: December 01, 2021, 03:46:27 AM 
Started by balomiri - Last post by balomiri
IMHO the issue is that the IPv6 LAN is not fully exposed to internet. This is due to dd-wrt implementation of IPv6!?

proof:
Code: [Select]
map done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 152.12 seconds
jupan@macaz ~ % nmap -6 -Pn 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742 -p 41455
Starting Nmap 7.92 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2021-12-01 12:35 CET
Nmap scan report for 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742
Host is up.

PORT      STATE    SERVICE
41455/tcp filtered unknown

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2.61 seconds

expected is that the IPv6 host is completely exposed if not explicitly port-wise closed.

Contingency plan: will give a try to ASUSWRT-MERLIN

 6 
 on: December 01, 2021, 01:39:25 AM 
Started by balomiri - Last post by tomkep
I don't know who filters it (you, HE or someone else) but someone definitely is:

Quote
triss:~> nmap -6 -Pn 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742
Starting Nmap 7.70 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2021-12-01 10:28 CET
Nmap scan report for 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742
Host is up (0.077s latency).
Not shown: 993 filtered ports
PORT     STATE  SERVICE
25/tcp   closed smtp
6666/tcp closed irc
6667/tcp closed irc
6668/tcp closed irc
6669/tcp closed irc
7000/tcp closed afs3-fileserver
9999/tcp closed abyss

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 28.12 seconds

All the ports reported as closed above are rejected by HE as they by default don't allow them and doing tcp-reset / icmp-port-unreachable facilitates fast failure here.

As for filtered ports - I have no clue. But I would check firewall on both your router and end-node.

 7 
 on: December 01, 2021, 01:14:13 AM 
Started by balomiri - Last post by balomiri
Great, many thanks. (This explains btw why windows/tracert finds the route)

BUT the issue is deeper.

https://[2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742]:41457 (example) does not work
The same IPv6 addr shows both

# ping6 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742 -c4
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:470:6f:2af:f09d:34ab:32d4:7d1f --> 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742
16 bytes from 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742, icmp_seq=0 hlim=58 time=56.203 ms
16 bytes from 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742, icmp_seq=1 hlim=58 time=645.630 ms
16 bytes from 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742, icmp_seq=2 hlim=58 time=49.874 ms
16 bytes from 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742, icmp_seq=3 hlim=58 time=71.052 ms 


and

traceroute6 -I 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742
traceroute6 to 2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742 (2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742) from 2001:470:6f:2af:f09d:34ab:32d4:7d1f, 64 hops max, 16 byte packets
 1  bubuasus  1.475 ms  1.463 ms  2.748 ms
 2  tunnel679637.tunnel.tserv27.prg1.ipv6.he.net  18.597 ms  26.606 ms  20.439 ms
 3  10ge2-1.core1.prg1.he.net  20.473 ms  24.037 ms  16.330 ms
 4  100ge16-1.core1.fra1.he.net  25.660 ms  26.684 ms  44.987 ms
 5  tserv1.fra1.he.net  29.863 ms  29.386 ms *
 6  tunnel571285-pt.tunnel.tserv6.fra1.ipv6.he.net  62.612 ms *  46.743 ms
 7  2001:470:1f0b:815:5e49:79ff:fe42:3742  51.810 ms  65.744 ms  95.876 ms


I'm not aware filtering anything...
Some hint? Thanks in advance....

 8 
 on: November 30, 2021, 10:57:46 PM 
Started by balomiri - Last post by tomkep
Traceroute by default uses UDP packets to port 53 (DNS). If you filtered it - it is obviously not responding.

You can try traceroute6 with -I option (capital i) for ICMPv6 tracerouting. This requires root priviliges however:

triss:~> sudo traceroute6 -I 2001:470:1f0a:813::2
traceroute to 2001:470:1f0a:813::2 (2001:470:1f0a:813::2), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
 1  boholt.jot23.net (2a0e:b107:c01:11::1)  0.282 ms  0.289 ms  0.326 ms
 2  as212888.r1-haa-nl.node.freetransit.ch (2a01:20e:1002:123::1)  57.793 ms  57.814 ms  57.811 ms
 3  * * *
 4  port-channel6.core2.ams2.he.net (2001:470:0:61c::2)  59.781 ms  59.790 ms  59.820 ms
 5  100ge10-2.core1.fra2.he.net (2001:470:0:4b7::1)  73.479 ms  73.481 ms  111.027 ms
 6  100ge16-2.core1.fra1.he.net (2001:470:0:404::1)  111.037 ms  109.145 ms  109.120 ms
 7  tserv1.fra1.he.net (2001:470:0:69::2)  109.110 ms  78.213 ms  80.034 ms
 8  tunnel571285-pt.tunnel.tserv6.fra1.ipv6.he.net (2001:470:1f0a:813::2)  110.547 ms  106.206 ms  106.171 ms

 9 
 on: November 30, 2021, 07:25:41 PM 
Started by matthewh - Last post by tjeske
Nope.

 10 
 on: November 30, 2021, 04:26:02 PM 
Started by balomiri - Last post by balomiri
Router Model: Asus RT-AC68U C1
Firmware Version:DD-WRT v3.0-r47695 std (11/29/21)
Kernel Version: Linux 4.4.293 #4478 SMP
=====
HE Tunnel works outbound ok (aka from a LAN host to an internet destination host
# traceroute6 google.com
traceroute to google.com (2a00:1450:4014:800::200e), 30 hops max, 64 byte packets
 1  tunnel679637.tunnel.tserv27.prg1.ipv6.he.net (2001:470:6e:2af::1)  72.119 ms  155.621 ms  134.423 ms
 2  10ge2-1.core1.prg1.he.net (2001:470:0:221::1)  111.130 ms  139.036 ms  120.566 ms
 3  nixcz-v6.net.google.com (2001:7f8:14::1d:1)  116.550 ms  641.548 ms  490.298 ms
 4  2001:4860:0:101a::1 (2001:4860:0:101a::1)  150.192 ms  151.816 ms  2001:4860:0:1019::1 (2001:4860:0:1019::1)  163.484 ms
 5  2001:4860:0:1::1dfd (2001:4860:0:1::1dfd)  142.201 ms  2001:4860:0:1::1c83 (2001:4860:0:1::1c83)  160.391 ms  276.248 ms
 6  prg03s01-in-x0e.1e100.net (2a00:1450:4014:800::200e)  372.200 ms  275.421 ms  560.619 ms
======
but
HE Tunnel does not reach destination inbound (from internet to LAN host)
#traceroute6 x.y.net
traceroute to x.y.net (2001:470:1f0a:813::2), 30 hops max, 64 byte packets
 1  tunnel679637.tunnel.tserv27.prg1.ipv6.he.net (2001:470:6e:2af::1)  34.887 ms  35.994 ms  28.516 ms
 2  10ge2-1.core1.prg1.he.net (2001:470:0:221::1)  20.314 ms  15.542 ms  25.843 ms
 3  100ge16-1.core1.fra1.he.net (2001:470:0:213::1)  35.004 ms  46.489 ms  38.700 ms
 4  tserv1.fra1.he.net (2001:470:0:69::2)  40.583 ms  35.104 ms  36.302 ms
 5  *  *  *
 6
=======
but
ping works well on same target host
ping6 x.y.net
PING x.y.net (2001:470:1f0a:813::2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2001:470:1f0a:813::2: seq=0 ttl=60 time=157.343 ms
64 bytes from 2001:470:1f0a:813::2: seq=1 ttl=60 time=723.237 ms

What is missing?


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10